Let’s Talk About Old Material And Redirect Chains

Posted by

While checking out some questions sent to SEJ after a recent webinar, two of them protruded to me as related and comparable.

That implies you remain in for a reward, gentile reader, because today’s an unique 2-for-1 variation of Ask an SEO.

Here are the concerns:

Ines asked: What do you make with old websites that have numerous URLs with very little traffic to most of them. Do you eliminate the bad content first? Just how much should I remove at a time? Exists a guideline? Should I take internal links into account?

Christina asked: Is it much better to reroute old content to brand-new material if that results in a redirect chain? Or should I simply erase that content?

Let’s Speak about Old Content

There’s a lot to unload here, so let’s dive into it.

I’ll get my animal peeve out of the way initially: Hopefully, you have dates on this old content, so that the readers who do stumble upon it know that it’s old and out-of-date.

There are a number of approaches you can take here, and a great deal of it depends upon your keyword research study and information.

The very first concern I ‘d ask myself for any piece of content is: Is this useful? Or is it hazardous (out of date, bad guidance, no longer pertinent, etc)?

If it’s hazardous or no longer relevant, like a post on how to grow your Google+ following, you can simply proceed and erase it. There’s absolutely nothing appropriate to reroute it to.

If it’s useful, you’re entrusted a few options:

  • Re-write it or integrate it with other content to see if you can get more traffic to it.
  • If you already have actually more upgraded or more relevant material, go ahead and 301 reroute it to that material.
  • If it no longer uses to your website or service, go ahead and erase it.

A lot of SEO pros will inform you that if it used to be an extremely popular piece with lots of external links you need to 301 it to maintain those links.

I’ll tell you to either find out why it’s no longer extremely popular and upgrade it or keep it up for historic purposes. It’s incredible just how much of the “old” internet no longer exists.

The secret here is to figure out why the content isn’t popular.

Once you do that you can follow the below recommendations:

– Does it fix a user need but is just bad quality? Re-write it.
– Is it no longer relevant/useful? Erase it.
– Exists newer or much better content elsewhere? Redirect it.
– Should I protect it for historic reasons? Or is there just little volume for that now, but I’m still getting traffic? Leave it alone.

OK, Now Let’s Talk About Redirects

Redirect chains get a great deal of bad press in SEO.

There used to be a ton of argument about whether they pass PageRank, just how much PageRank they pass, how much decays, how many Google will follow, and so on.

For 99.9999925% of individuals, none of that matters.

If these are things we require to stress over, they’re so very little that they don’t have much of an effect. The fact is Google will follow redirects and will pass some “value” through them.

There’s no unfavorable effect or charge from having redirect chains but go for not more than five hops as Google may drop from following the redirects.

Sure, they aren’t ideal. They will include a couple of milliseconds of load time for your page, and they may not send 100% of the PageRank worth through to the location, however all that is very little and, honestly, over-thinking SEO.

When deciding if you need to reroute or erase content, utilize the rubric above.

And as a finest practice, if you have redirect chains, bring them to a very little by updating redirects to point straight to the last destination.

For example, if you have A-> B-> C (one redirect chain), produce A-> C and B-> C (two redirects) rather.

Hope this assists.

Have a question about SEO? Send via this form.

More resources:


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *